SBV Journal of Basic, Clinical and Applied Health Science

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Socioeconomic–demographic Factors in Varying Degrees of Anemia in Pregnancy

Nupur Hooja, Surabhi Arora, Smriti Bhargava, Premlata Mital

Keywords : Demographic, Literacy, Socioeconomic,Anemia

Citation Information : Hooja N, Arora S, Bhargava S, Mital P. Socioeconomic–demographic Factors in Varying Degrees of Anemia in Pregnancy. 2020; 3 (3):122-124.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10082-02239

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-09-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The prevalence of anemia in pregnancy varies considerably because of differences in socioeconomic conditions. The aim was to study association of sociodemographic factors with varying degrees of anemia. Materials and methods: The study done at SMS Medical College, Jaipur, included four groups of normal, mild, moderate, and severely anemic women with 35 women in each group. Data on sociodemographic details of the women were collected and analyzed. Results: Women from rural area, lower socioeconomic background, and with poor education had more number of cases with severe anemia. The average duration at antenatal booking was 14 weeks in nonanemic and 28.2 weeks in severe anemia. Conclusion: Poor literacy levels, rural background, and lower socioeconomic background influence the degree of anemia. Early antenatal booking should be enforced. Clinical significance: Educational and economic upliftment of the women would help to reduce the overall prevalence of anemia in pregnancy.


PDF Share
  1. Bukar M, Audu BM, Yahaya UR, Melah GS. Anaemia in pregnancy at booking in Gombe, North-eastern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;28(8):775–778. DOI: 10.1080/01443610802463835.
  2. Al-Mehaisen L, Khader Y, Al-Kuran O, Abu Issa F, Amarin Z. Maternal anemia in rural Jordan: room for improvement. Anemia 2011;2011:381812. DOI: 10.1155/2011/381812.
  3. Figueiredo ACMG, Gomes-Filho IS, Batista JET, Orrico GS, Porto ECL, Cruz Pimenta RM, et al. Maternal anemia and birth weight: a prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE 2019;14(3):e0212817. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212817.
  4. Key Findings from National Family Health Survey. Available from: http://www.rchiips.org/NFHS/pdf/NFHS4/India.pdf. (accessed on 18 Nov 2019).
  5. Tibambuya BA, Ganle JK, Ibrahim M. Anaemia at antenatal care initiation and associated factors among pregnant women in West Gonja district, Ghana: across-sectional study. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;33:325.
  6. WHO, Worldwide Prevalence of Anaemia 1993–2005: WHO Global Database on Anaemia, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  7. Kalaivani K. Prevalence & consequences of anaemia in pregnancy. Indian J Med Res 2009;130(5):627–633.
  8. Dudala SR, Arlappa N. An updated Prasad's socio economic status classification for 2013. Int J Res Dev Health 2013;1:26–28.
  9. Melku M, Zelalem A, Meseret A, Bamlaku E. Prevalence and predictors of maternal anaemia during pregnancy in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia: an institutional based cross-sectional study. Anemia 2014(6):108593. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/108593. (accessed on 18 Nov 2019).
  10. Miglani U, Bhangadia P, Kadam VK, Laul P. Anaemia in term pregnancy: influence on maternal and perinatal outcome and role of demographic factors. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2019;8(1):251–257. DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20185434.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.