SBV Journal of Basic, Clinical and Applied Health Science

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Role of Technology in Medical Education: SWOC Analysis

Keywords : COVID-19, Medical education, Technology

Citation Information : Role of Technology in Medical Education: SWOC Analysis. 2022; 5 (1):19-21.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10082-03131

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 04-06-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


The traditional methods of medical education were dependent and restricted on the mainstays of printed textbooks, chalkboards, photographic projection-based classroom lectures, and cadaver dissection laboratories. Due to revolutionary changes in the medical curriculum of undergraduate and postgraduate training, there is a rapid transformation from knowledge-based to competency-based education patterns. In a very precise way, utilization of the modern teaching aids has led to optimization of medical students’ engagement by acclimatization to the dynamic and exhaustive medical curriculum in the best way possible even in the unprecedented times of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). In conclusion, gradual and systematic digitalization of learning of medical students should be synchronized with the traditional didactic lectures to have maximum compliance with the current model of medical education. However, this could be only possible when both the learner and the faculty are competent enough to utilize modern teaching and learning aids of technology to get the best outcomes from the process of teaching, learning, and assessment.

  1. Muttappallymyalil J, Mendis S, John LJ, Shanthakumari N, Sreedharan J,Shaikh RB. Evolution of technology in teaching: blackboard and beyond in medical education. Nepal J Epidemiol 2016;6(3):588–592. DOI: 10.3126/nje.v6i3.15870.
  2. Trelease RB. From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-learning: how computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anat Sci Educ 2016;9(6):583–602. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1620.
  3. Medical Council of India. Regulations on Graduate Medical Education; 2012. Available from: target=”_blank”href=””/tools/announcement/Revised_GME_2012.pdf [Last accessed on March 12, 2022].
  4. Guze PA. Using technology to meet the challenges of medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2015;126:260–270. PMID: 26330687.
  5. Iobst WF, Sherbino J, Cate OT, Richardson DL, Dath D, Swing SR, et al. Competency-based medical education inpostgraduate medical education. MedTeach 2010;32(8):651–656. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.500709.
  6. Rodríguez-Ríos A, Espinoza-Téllez G, Martínez-Ezquerro JD, Rendón-Macías ME. Information and communication technology, mobile devices, and medical education. J Med Syst 2020;44(4):90. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-020-01559-w.
  7. Slivkoff MD, Bahner I, Bonaminio G, et al. Evolution and revolution in medical education: technology in the twenty-first century, an IAMSE webcast audio seminar series, Fall 2018. Med Sci Educ 2019;29(1):333–337. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-018-00681-2.
  8. Kay D, Pasarica M. Using technology to increase student (and faculty satisfaction with) engagement in medical education. Adv Physiol Educ 2019;43(3):408–413. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00033.2019.
  9. Ashraf H, Sodergren MH, Merali N, Mylonas G, Singh H, Darzi A. Eye-tracking technology in medical education: a systematic review. Med Teach 2018;40(1):62–69. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1391373.
  10. Han H, Resch DS, Kovach RA. Educational technology in medical education. Teach Learn Med 2013;25(Suppl 1):S39–S43. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2013.842914.
  11. Friedman KA, Herman SW, Fornari A. Medical education using minimal technology: achieving professional development. Med Educ Online 2019;24(1):1622365. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1622365.
  12. Almarzooq ZI, Lopes M, Kochar A. Virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a disruptive technology in graduate medical education. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75(20):2635–2638. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.015.
  13. Pei L, Wu H. Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ Online 2019;24(1):1666538. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538.
  14. Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J, Hannigan A, Last J, McGrath D. Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education: an integrative review. BMC Med Educ 2018;18(1):130. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0.
  15. Rajab MH, Gazal AM, Alkattan K. Challenges to online medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus 2020;12(7):e8966. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.8966.
  16. Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, Abdelwahed A, Al-Nusair L. Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ Open 2020;10(11):e042378. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042378.
  17. Ahmed SA, Hegazy NN, Abdel Malak HW, Cliff Kayser W 3rd, Elrafie NM, Hassanien M, et al. Model for utilizing distance learning post-COVID-19 using (PACT)™ a cross-sectional qualitative study. BMC Med Educ 2020;20(1):400. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02311-1.
  18. Sengupta P, Sharma A, Das N. Is there any benefit of integrating computer-assisted learning with conventional teaching format in pharmacology to demonstrate the effects of different drugs on mean arterial blood pressure in an anesthetized dog: a comparative study? J Nat Sci Biol Med 2017;8(2):181–185. DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.210013.
  19. Kye B, Han N, Kim E, Park Y, Jo S. Educational applications of metaverse: possibilities and limitations. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2021;18:32. DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.32.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.