SBV Journal of Basic, Clinical and Applied Health Science

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2023 ) > List of Articles


Framework for Performance Appraisal of Teaching Faculty in Medical Institutions

Rasdita Nurhidayati

Keywords : Medical colleges, Performance appraisal, Teaching faculty

Citation Information : Nurhidayati R. Framework for Performance Appraisal of Teaching Faculty in Medical Institutions. 2023; 6 (4):86-87.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10082-03198

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-09-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Performance appraisal of teaching faculty in medical institutions is an important and indispensable activity. This must be carried out periodically to ascertain the quality of output produced by faculty members under different domains and the kind of help/support which they might need to strengthen the ongoing activities. A number of techniques have been employed in different settings for performance appraisal, depending on the local requirements, available resources, and other logistics support. In conclusion, the task of performance appraisal carries immense significance in medical institutions. However, considering the availability of multiple such frameworks, it is essential that each institution should consider the pros and cons of different frameworks and then take a well-informed decision.

  1. Gesme DH, Wiseman M. Performance appraisal: a tool for practice improvement. J Oncol Pract 2011;7:131–134. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2010.000214.
  2. Gillani A, Jarvi K, De Angelis A. Fostering a culture of accountability through a performance appraisal system. Healthc Manage Forum 2005;18:35–38. DOI: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60304-3.
  3. Peretz H, Fried Y. National cultures, performance appraisal practices, and organizational absenteeism and turnover: a study across 21 countries. J Appl Psychol 2012;97:448–459. DOI: 10.1037/a0026011.
  4. Grote RC. The performance appraisal question and answer book: A survival guide for managers. New York: American Management Association, 2002.
  5. Aggarwal A, Thakur GSM. Techniques of performance appraisal- A review. Int J Engineering Adv Technol 2013;2:617–621.
  6. Dupee JM, Ernst NP, Caslin KE. Does multisource feedback influence performance appraisal satisfaction? Nurs Manage 2011;42:12–16. DOI: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000394060.41121.ce.
  7. Castanelli D, Kitto S. Perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs of staff anaesthetists related to multi-source feedback used for their performance appraisal. Br J Anaesth 2011;107:372–377. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer152.
  8. Aguinis H, Gottfredson RK, Joo H. Delivering effective performance feedback: The strengths-based approach. Business Horizons 2012;55:105–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2011.10.004.
  9. van Woerkom M, Kroon B. The effect of strengths-based performance appraisal on perceived supervisor support and the motivation to improve performance. Front Psychol 2020;11:1883. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01883.
  10. Becker J, Bridge P, Brown E, Lusk R, Ferrari-Anderson J. Evaluation of a performance appraisal framework for radiation therapists in planning and simulation. J Med Radiat Sci 2015;62:114–121. DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.106.
  11. Schoessler MT, Aneshansley P, Baffaro C, Castellano T, Goins L, Largaespada E, et al. The performance appraisal as a developmental tool. J Nurses Staff Dev 2008;24:E12–E18. DOI: 10.1097/01.NND.0000320654.87802.16.
  12. Kalb KB, Cherry NM, Kauzloric J, Brender A, Green K, Miyagawa L, et al. A competency-based approach to public health nursing performance appraisal. Public Health Nurs 2006;23:115–138. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2006.230204.x.
  13. Kiely SC. Junior faculty performance appraisal in general internal medicine. Acad Med 2002;77:458–459.
  14. Rotondi AJ, Sirio CA, Angus DC, Pinsky MR. A new conceptual framework for ICU performance appraisal and improvement. J Crit Care 2002;17:16–28. DOI: 10.1053/jcrc.2002.33033.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.