SBV Journal of Basic, Clinical and Applied Health Science

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2019 ) > List of Articles

MEDICAL EDUCATION

Perception and assessment of scholarship in health science institutions in India – gap between the existing and the desirable

Keywords : Scholarship, scholarly activity, assessment of medical faculty, scholarliness

Citation Information : Perception and assessment of scholarship in health science institutions in India – gap between the existing and the desirable. 2019; 2 (1):32-38.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10082-02107

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-10-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Abstract

Scholarship or scholarly activity is implied as part of the “job requirement” of faculty in health sciences. However, the concept of scholarship other than an emphasis on publications is hitherto lacking in India with no weightage being given to all four components of scholarship as described by Boyer, viz. the scholarship of discovery, application, integration or teaching leave alone a weightage for innovative activities. This paper describes the components of scholarly activities, the current requirement or lack of it of “mandatory” training right from the undergraduate student days in scholarly activities, poor scholarly requirements for postgraduates and a faculty appraisal which values only publications. Metrics have been suggested for all individual five components of scholarship and an emphasis has been laid on training right from the beginning of medical education for the activity to be internalized.


PDF Share
  1. Boyer E L. Scholarship Reconsidered, Priorities of the professoriate, a special report. Princeton, NJ. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990.
  2. Grady EC, Roise A, Barr D, Lynch D, Lee KB, Daskivich T, et al. Defining scholarly activity in graduate medical education. J Grad Med Educ. 2012; 4:558-61.
  3. Glassick, CE, Huber, MT, Maeroff, GI. Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. Special Report. Princeton, NJ. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1997. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED461318 [accessed on 2019 Jan 28].
  4. Core Committee, Institute for International Medical Education, Global minimum essential requirements in medical education. Med Teach 2002; 24:130-5.
  5. Siemens DR, Punne S, Wong J, Kanji N. A survey on the attitudes towards research in medical school. BMC Med Educ. 2010; 10:4.
  6. Bugoyne LN, O'Flynn S, Boylan GB. Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective. Med Educ Online. 2010 Sep 10;15. doi: 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5212.
  7. Espenshade TJ, Radford AW. No longer separate, not yet equal - race and class in elite college admissions and campus life. 2009. ISBN 9780691141602, Princeton University Press, NJ, USA.
  8. Sanford T, Chancer Z, Kiyosaki K. Medical Students at the John A. Burns School of Medicine (JABSOM): The research interest group. Hawaii Med J 2010; 69: 172-3.
  9. Wickramasinghe DP, Perera CS, Senarathna S, Samarasekara DN. Patterns and trends of medical student research. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:175.
  10. Office for undergraduate research, Emerging scholars’ program. University of Alabama, USA. https://undergraduateresearch.ua.edu/emerging-scholars-program [accessed on 2019 Jan 28].
  11. Independent Scholarly Project, Georgetown University School of Medicine, USA. https://som.georgetown.edu/independentscholarly [accessed on 2019 Jan 28].
  12. Graduate Program in Biomedical Sciences, Summer Undergraduate Research Program, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, USA. https://www.einstein.yu.edu/education/phd/the-summer-undergradresearch-program.aspx [accessed on 2019 Jan 28]
  13. School of Medicine Scholarly Activity, University of Utah School of Medicine, https://medicine.utah.edu/students/programs/md/curriculum/scholarly-activity.php [accessed on 2019 Jan 28]
  14. Scholarly Activity Guidelines Review Committee for Family Medicine. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramResources/120_scholarly-activity-guidelines.pdf [accessed on 2019 Jan 28]
  15. Medical council of India postgraduate medical education regulations, 2000, (amended up to may, 2018), medical council of India, Clause 13.9, page 39. https://old.mciindia.org/Rules-and-Regulation/Postgraduate-Medical-Education-Regulations-2000.pdf [accessed on 2019 Jan 28].
  16. Diamond RM. Defining scholarship for the twenty-first century, New Directions for Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.57 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/tl.57 [accessed on 2019 Jan 28].
  17. Chacko TV, Supe A. Scholarship in Medical Education. In, The Art of Teaching Medical Students, Bhuiyan PS, Rege, NN, Supe A, eds. Edition 3, Elsevier, New Delhi, 2015, 448-60.
  18. Kreber C. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning and the Online Classroom. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268295089_The_Scholarship_of_Teaching_and_Learning_and_the_Online_Classroom [accessed on 2019 Jan 28].
  19. Morahan PS, Fleetwood J. The double helix of activity and scholarship: building a medical education career with limited resources. Med Edu, 2008;42:34-44.
  20. Hatch, T, White ME, Shulman LS. Into the Classroom: Developing the scholarship of teaching and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2006.
  21. Ciccone, T. Examining the impact of SoTL. International Commons, 2008; 3: 12–13. http://www.issotl.org/International_Commons_3_1.pdf [accessed on 2019 Jan 28].
  22. Floyd G. Iowa State University Teaching Seminar August, 2005 Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT) The Challenges of Teaching and Learning. https://slideplayer.com/slide/7079802/ [accessed on 2019 Jan 28].
  23. Gossman P, Haigh N, and Jiao X. The Status of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) in Three New Zealand Universities: Three Institutional Case Studies (Final Report to the Ministry of education, the national centre of tertiary teaching excellence). New Zealand. 2013. Cited by Doherty I, Achieving excellence in teaching: A case study in embedding professsional development for teaching within a research intensive university. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666- 3661-3.ch017, University of Hong kong 2013.
  24. Shulman, L. S. From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a scholarship of teaching and learning? Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2000; 1:48-52.
  25. Trigwell K, Shale S. Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Studies in higher education, 2004, 29, 523-536.
  26. Wright SM, Kravet S, Christmas C, Burkhart, K. Creating an Academy of Clinical Excellence at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center: A 3-Year Experience Academic medicine: journal of the association of american medical colleges 2010 85:1833-9. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181fa416c [accessed on 2019 Jan 28].
  27. Clinical Activities Portfolio Guidelines for creating and maintaining your portfolio, McMaster University Health Sciences, 2012 https://fhs.mcmaster.ca/facultyrelations/documents/ClinicalActivitiesPortfolioJan2012-1.pdf [accessed on 2019 Jan 28].
  28. Indian Nursing Council Guidelines and minimum requirements to establish B Sc. (N) College of nursing https://www. indiannursingcouncil.org/pdf/guidelines-for-BSc_New.pdf [accessed on 2019 Jan 28].
  29. Dental Council of India, Notification. Published in the Gazette of India, Part III, Section 4. http://www.dciindia.org.in/Rule_Regulation/MDS_Course_Regulations_2017.pdf [accessed on 2019 Jan 28]
  30. Teachers Eligibility Qualifications, 1998, Salient Features of Minimum Qualifications for teachers in Medical Institutions, regulations, 1998, (Amended up to June, 2017, Medical Council of India, https://www.mciindia.org/CMS/rules-regulations/teacherseligibility- qualifications-1998. [accessed on 2019 Jan 28]
  31. UGC regulations on minimum qualifications for appointment of teachers and other academic staff in state agriculture universities. Indian Council of Agricultural research. http://www.nduat.org/Doc/Advertisement(Veterinary)No.2-2015.pdf. [accessed on 2019 Jan 28]
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.