SBV Journal of Basic, Clinical and Applied Health Science

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2021 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Sonographic Placental Thickness as a Determinant of Fetal Gestational Age: A Review

Sukrati Ranjan, Harshavardhan Balaganesan, Sai Shankar, Subramaniyan Venkataraman

Keywords : Antenatal care, Gestational age, Placental thickness, Pregnancy dating, Ultrasound

Citation Information : Ranjan S, Balaganesan H, Shankar S, Venkataraman S. Sonographic Placental Thickness as a Determinant of Fetal Gestational Age: A Review. 2021; 4 (3):66-68.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10082-03117

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 09-09-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Accurate estimation of fetal gestational age is important for the appropriate management of pregnancy. Gestational age is usually calculated from the last menstrual period or fetal biometrics like crown-rump length and femur length. Both these methods are relatively inaccurate. Placental thickness has long been looked at as a maternofetal parameter for estimating gestational age primarily because it does not rely on either menstrual history or fetal measurements affected by anomalies or inconsistent measurements as the gestational advances. The purpose of this study was to review the role of placental thickness in estimating fetal gestational age. It was found that placental thickness increased linearly with the increase in gestational age and thus is a function of gestational age. Most of the studies agreed that this relationship can be exploited to predict gestational age when it is unknown. Along with other already established parameters, the placental thickness may help to give a more accurate estimate of gestational age and consequently help to identify premature babies that require specialized care. This would go a long way in reducing perinatal mortality rates due to prematurity and better fetal outcomes. Key Message: Placental thickness correlates well with fetal gestational age and can be used as a potential new parameter for estimating fetal gestational age to guide appropriate pregnancy management. This will result in better fetal outcomes with decreased mortality statistics.


PDF Share
  1. Guttmacher AE, Maddox YT, Spong CY. The Human Placenta Project: placental structure, development, and function in real time. Placenta 2014;35(5):303–304. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.02.012.
  2. Kanne JP, Lalani TA, Fligner CL. The placenta revisited: radiologic–pathologic correlation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2005;34(6):238–255. DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2005.08.001.
  3. Elchalal U, Ezra Y, Levi Y, Bar-Oz B, Yanai N, Intrator O, et al. Sonographically thick placenta: a marker for increased perinatal risk—a prospective cross-sectional study. Placenta 2000;21(2–3): 268–272. DOI: 10.1053/plac.1999.0466.
  4. De Paula CF, Ruano R, Campos JA, Zugaib M. Placental volumes measured by 3-dimensional ultrasonography in normal pregnancies from 12–40 weeks’ gestation. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27(11): 1583–1590. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.11.1583.
  5. Hoddick WK, Mahony BS, Callen PW, Filly RA. Placental thickness. J Ultrasound Med 1985;4(9):479–482. DOI: 10.7863/jum.1985.4.9.479.
  6. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015-16. India. Mumbai: IIPS; 2017.
  7. Choorakuttil RM, Patel H, Bavaharan R, Devarajan P, Kanhirat S, Shenoy RS, et al. Samrakshan: an Indian radiological and imaging association program to reduce perinatal mortality in India. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2019;29(4):412. DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_386_19.
  8. Sharma LK, Bindal J, Shrivastava VA, Sharma M, Choorakuttil RM, Nirmalan PK. Discordant dating of pregnancy by LMP and ultrasound and its implications in perinatal statistics. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2020;30(1):27–31. DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_383_19.
  9. Mital P, Hooja N, Mehndiratta K. Placental thickness: a sonographic parameter for estimating gestational age of the fetus. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2002;12(4):553.
  10. Karthikeyan T, Subramaniam RK, Johnson WM, Prabhu K. Placental thickness and its correlation to gestational age and foetal growth parameters—a cross sectional ultrasonographic study. J Clin Diagn Res 2012;6(10):1732. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4867.2652.
  11. Ohagwu CC, Abu PO, Udoh BE. Placental thickness: a sonographic indicator of gestational age in normal singleton pregnancies in Nigerian women. Internet J Medical Update-EJOURNAL. 2009;4(2). DOI: 10.4314/ijmu.v4i2.43837.
  12. Nagwani M, Sharma PK, Singh U, Rani A, Mehrotra S. Ultrasonographic measurement of placental thickness and its correlation with gestational age–a cross-sectional ultrasonographic study. Int J Adv Res 2014;2:354–360. ISSN 2320-5407.
  13. Njeze NR, Ogbochukwu JO, Chinawa JM. Correlation of ultrasound placental diameter and thickness with gestational age. Pak J Med Sci 2020;36(5):1058–1062. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.36.5.1938.
  14. Khatri MH, Ghaffar A, Mahmood R. Estimation of gestational age of the fetus by measuring placental thickness. J Surg Pak 2005;10(1):5–7. P-ISSN: 1817-0242.
  15. Azagidi AS, Ibitoye BO, Makinde ON, Idowu BM, Aderibigbe AS. Fetal gestational age determination using ultrasound placental thickness. J Med Ultrasound 2020;28(1):17. DOI: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_127_18.
  16. Kaushal L, Patil A, Kocherla K. Evaluation of placental thickness as a sonological indicator for estimation of gestational age of foetus in normal singleton pregnancy. Int J Res Med Sci 2015;3(5):1213–1218. DOI: 10.5455/2320-6012. IJRMS20150534.
  17. Ali RK. A study of relationship between placental thickness and fetal age in 3rd trimester in Sudanese Women [Doctoral dissertation]. Sudan University of Science and Technology; 2018.
  18. Verma AK, Malhotra V, Yadav R, Chavhan R. Placental thickness estimation by ultrasonography and its correlation with gestational age in normal pregnancies in late 2nd and 3rd trimester. Asian Pac J Health Sci 2017;4:130–132. DOI: 10.21276/apjhs.2017.4.4.31.
  19. Adeyekun AA. Ultrasound assessment of placental thickness and its correlation with gestational age in normal pregnancy: a preliminary report. Sahel Med J 2012;15(1):10.
  20. Kakumanu PK, Kondragunta C, GandraNR YH. Evaluation of placental thickness as an ultrasonographic parameter for estimating gestational age of the fetus in 2nd and 3rd trimesters. Int J Contemp Med Surg Radiol 2018;3(1):128–132.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.